Judgment reversed where trial court docket abused its discretion in denying appellants motion for deferred disposition underneath Code § 18.2-57.3 primarily based on its belief that deferred dispositions shouldn’t be out there for assault and battery crimes; case remanded to contemplate whether appellant is an appropriate candidate for a deferred disposition 0095224 Leon Strom v. Transdev Services, Inc. and Old Republic Ins. Trial court docket did not err in requiring appellant to reimburse appellee for half of deferred profit sharing dividends, requiring appellant to reimburse appellee for cash removed from the joint account or in denying attorneys fees to appellee; trial court docket erred in requiring appellee to reimburse appellant for rent and household expenses 0321214 Adrienne Mallard v. Next Day Temps, Inc. and Accident Fund General Ins. Trial courtroom didn’t err in revoking the remaining seven years of appellants suspended sentence after he incurred new criminal convictions in the course of the suspension period and after the judge thought-about his mitigating proof 0648224 Dominic Tran, et al. Trial courtroom didn’t err finding proof enough to convict appellant of sexual battery and strangulation; an affordable trier of truth may conclude appellant acted with the requisite criminal intent, sexually abused the sufferer by way of intimidation and without the victims consent, and the victim suffered a bodily damage 1712221 Stephen R. Jones, et al.

Trial court docket didn’t err discovering proof ample to convict appellant of malicious wounding; no error rejecting appellants self-defense declare the place appellant initiated the attack, did not retreat, and used excessive pressure 0674222 Norfolk District Associates, LLC v. The town of Norfolk, et al. Trial court didn’t err in concluding that a witness testimony was not inherently unbelievable; no error in denying appellants movement to set aside the verdict and order a new trial based mostly on after-discovered evidence the place appellant failed to exhibit materiality of the evidence 1105222 Tonya D. Chapman v. Jonathan Burkett, et al. Trial court docket did not err finding evidence ample to convict appellant of tried malicious wounding and tried robbery; appellants use of a knife to thrust on the victims stomach enough to show intent to maim, disfigure, disable, or kill; report helps trial courts conclusion appellant intended to steal victims money 1758221 Jeremy Kooiman, et al. Trial courtroom didn’t abuse its discretion by denying appellants movement to withdraw his Alford pleas to tried homicide and first-diploma homicide where appellant didn’t establish an inexpensive protection to the fees 0136233 Watan Holdings, LLC v. Violet Blankenship, et al. Judgment affirmed as trial court docket did not err permitting testimony of possible complications from surgery in a medical malpractice declare; trial court didn’t abuse its discretion in refusing a cumulative empty chair instruction, granting mere occurring directions, or in excluding certain uncooked statistical proof; appellant didn’t proffer excluded testimony 0445232 Roy Black v. C. T. Woody, Jr., et al.

Judgment affirmed as appellants approbation and reprobation is fatal to its argument that the trial courtroom erred in dismissing appellants motion for declaratory judgment 1234222 The East End Landfill, LLC v. Board of Supervisors of Henrico County et al. Trial court didn’t err in finding appellant in contempt where the evidence showed appellant didn’t act in good faith and did not use his finest efforts to take away appellees title from the real property at concern, in awarding appellee attorneys charges underneath the separation agreement, or in denying appellants request for attorneys fees 1430202 William G. Fendley, IV. Trial court didn’t abuse its discretion by denying appellants request that it run her revoked time concurrent with sentences acquired in one other jurisdiction after considering all of the proof, including mitigating proof 1292224 Gregory A. Kwiatkowski, et al. Trial court docket did not abuse its discretion in allowing Eleanor Hunter to present certain evidence and testimony that was not disclosed according to the timeline set out in the scheduling order; no abuse of discretion in granting Eleanor Hunters request for lawyer charges and denying appellants request for charges 1319221 Mid-Atlantic Women’s Care, P.L.C.

Trial court docket did not err find decedents hearsay statements concerning his fall didn’t require corroboration below the Virginia Dead Mans Statute, Code § 8.01-397; no abuse of discretion in failing to strike testimony of estates expert witnesses, denying demonstrative exhibit, and refusing sure jury directions; no error in denying motions to strike and put aside verdict 1237221 Charles M. Hunter, Jr. v. Eleanor A. Hunter, et al. Judgment affirmed as a timely-filed transcript, or written statement of details in lieu of a transcript, is essential to permit a evaluate of the deserves of appellants assignments of error related to sanctions, Rule 5A:8(b)(4)(ii), and those assignments of error are also barred by Rule 5A:18; appellants nonsuit rendered the argument concerning the denial of his movement for recusal moot 1904224 Wayne Shorter v. Darien Cherry, et al. Judgment affirmed as a timely-filed transcript of the September 1, 2022 custody hearing, or written statement of information in lieu of a transcript, is essential to permit a review of the merits of appellants assignments of error, Rule 5A:8(b)(4)(ii) 1926224 Jeffrey Poole, et al. Judgment affirmed as appellants argument the trial court docket erred in dismissing depend IV of his complaint is barred by Rule 5A:20; a timely-filed transcript, or written statement of info in lieu of a transcript, is essential to permit a assessment of appellants assignments of errors, Rule 5A:8(b)(4)(ii) 1232222 The East End Landfill, LLC v. The County of Henrico Virginia, et al.